4.1 Why use LOD for ancient written artefacts?

In this lesson,  the rationale behind utilising Linked Open Data (LOD) for ancient written artefacts is explored. The lesson adresses the application within the Semantic Web framework, highlighting its role in facilitating data interoperability and integration. Furthermore, the significance of LOD in bibliographic and cultural heritage contexts is examined, highlighting its potential to enhance accessibility and knowledge dissemination. Finally, the importance of selecting an appropriate classification system to effectively organize and navigate LOD resources is explained.

4.1.4 Finding a suitable classification system

Sometimes it can be a challenge trying to classify a specific type, if no existing classification system encompasses such a type. Take the example of the Gǝʿǝz Manuscripts scholar, Dr. Hagos Abrha. His research includes the study of a unique manuscript known as the "Marawəḥ Manuscript", which is described as a "peacock-shaped" or fan manuscript. However, a challenge arose during the classification process, as existing systems are no fit for this particular type. While it may be perceived as an exception, it highlights a common issue in the world of Linked Open Data. Many researchers encounter these difficulties in identifying suitable classifications for their data, resulting in frustration and a sense of overwhelm due to the abundance of information that does not align with their specific needs.

While this viewpoint may not fully acknowledge the design principles of the semantic web, the core idea remains: if something is missing, it can be added. However, in practice, only a limited number of individuals can actively contribute. This emphasizes the importance of supportive infrastructures and projects. In Dr. Hagos Abrha's research, he could potentially resolve the issue by defining the value within the Beta Masaheft project. Another widely recognized example is the Pleiades project, which exemplifies a seamless, well-regulated, and collaborative workflow for defining (ancient) places. 

These examples highlight the balance between accessibility and maintaining a structured, collaborative approach to enriching the semantic web. They showcase how individuals can contribute to filling information gaps while ensuring data integrity and reliability. When contributing to Pleiades, without prior knowledge of any of the RDF and LOD concepts, you are contributing to the production and publication of reusable RDF resources.

Another good example of a supportive infrastructure is Wikidata. Wikidata is especially powerful because it is generic and allows to link across resources. Back in 2020 a property was created to store the Beta Masaheft ID (with currently 700 entities using these IDs). Similarly, there is a Wikidata property for Pleiades ID.

You can see a general introduction video here:

Tutorial Wikidata


Exercise

Surf to Wikidata Query builder to answer the following question. 


The solution can be found in the following screencast: 

Resources